CHURCHES AGAINST GOD? [This page was updated on April 20, 2025]

When I realized that GOD exists, I initially thought the churches would be the right ones/teach the right thing.
BUT, I am NOT allowed to advise, and neither are the ISLAMIC ones. One MUST live up to one's responsibility and examine the facts.

§§§ THE ➡️2 ABSOLUTE RESPONSIBILITIES A CHRISTIAN MUST FULFILL:
➡️1. MAKE SURE YOU'RE NOT FIGHTING AGAINST GOD
ℹ️(Since there is an EXPLICIT biblical possibility that all but a few will worship the Antichrist, more on this later in the prospectus. Whoever you are, you are NEVER the ULTIMATE that determines what prophecy means. Rather, it is what it is, and the question is whether YOU interpret/understand it CORRECTLY, AND THE ASSORTMENT OF FACTS PROVIDES THE PROOF.)
➡️2. BE SURE WHAT THE LAW OF THE NEW COVENANT IS
ℹ️(which is what constitutes the NEW COVENANT, according to Jeremiah 31:33, definition/explanation of which...THIS IS THE NEW COVENANT. I WILL put MY LAW [THORATI, the "my" form of Torah, Torah=Law] in their MIND and write it on their HEARTS [NOT A NEW, DIFFERENT, or PARTS OF THE LAW])


BECAUSE THERE IS ONE IN THE BIBLE WHO SAYS "Do it, WITHOUT knowing if it is right, Eve, eat the fruit [the apple *is not mentioned there]" & ONE who does not want kings under him, but JUDGES. The one who judges ALL flesh on earth, & every SPIRIT.
You and an Islamic stand before God, both have guessed/guessed that he will go to hell, and you to heaven?
Blasphemous what one makes of God with this, perhaps without thinking. God is a God of law, not of guesswork; He demands accountability.

What many do not realize/understand due to a lack of knowledge of the spiritual language [explained below] is: The law is greater than faith. No matter how strong your faith is, if you do not fulfill some laws or transgress some, you will be thrown into hell [Overview the whole picture & place it in context!].



§§§ The two absolute responsibilities also very drastically differentiate the two different groups of Christians:
➡️Group A) Theoretical Christians
➡️Group B) Church Christians

➡️❗Basically, it's about the following major theme: The Daniel 7:25 prophecy
Daniel 7:25: … He (someone evil, even the Antichrist, usually the Antichrist for everyone) will "seek to do it" (intend to do it) To change times (festivals, meaning festivals that are also mentioned in the law, so here it is specified which part of the law) & the law itself…! So: First the part about festivals in the law, then the law in general. In prophecy, an "and" always means a possible temporal bridging. 👮🛑👉 Why is Daniel 7:25 about it, and why is this division important? Because the church did exactly that. The church changed both in the 4th century, times and the law, in the prophesied order for the wicked. This is absolutely undisputed and a 100% historical fact. Among other things… The fact that the church also killed people who did not follow its rules is an undisputed historical fact.
There is no discussion about this.
The killing is clearly documented.
Some call changing times and laws a "continuation," which is the same thing, a change.
That is the core of the difference in lifestyle and biblical interpretation between A and B, which is also completely independent of the prophecy of Daniel 7:25.
⭐Martin Luther also directly applied Daniel 7:25 to the papacy (more details below), so it is nothing minor or new at all.



That is the core difference between the ➡️2 groups:
➡️Group A) Those who say it never happened A JURISDICTION IN THE NT! ABSOLUTELY NOT! ABSURD!
➡️GROUP B) THEY SAY WE SEE A JURISDICTION IN THE NT FOR THE CHANGES IN TIMES (Christmas/Easter/etc.) & LAW (including the 10 Commandments, which the Church changed).
ℹ️GOD does not leave such things in question, as it is the most important thing. So, ONE GROUP is subject to the CLEAR, PROPHECIAL (more on this later) ERRORS.

Therefore, one can divide Christians into two groups according to Daniel 7:25.
➡️GROUP A) 👉 THORA CHRISTIANS [Messianic Jews / Hebrew Roots / Adventists / all other Torah Christians] - Not everyone in Group A says that the prophecy has been 100% fulfilled through the Church (a personal one, unfortunately...), but the majority do.
➡️GROUP B) 👉 The Catholic Church and the other churches that are descended from the Catholic Church, which have adopted most of the heresy, even if not all of it.

Even though there are numerous other Church heresies, this is the most important core point, Daniel 7:25. BUT everything comes down to the LAW; is it permitted/desired or NOT?
THE CORE POINT INCLUDES, AMONG OTHER THINGS... EVEN MORE EXTREMES LIKE: "Taking the pagan as from God" (Like putting a cross on the literally satanic obelisk in Petersplatz, and then the satanic is "Christified." Something that doesn't exist in the Bible in the slightest, a "Christified," but God has such things destroyed, absolutely always).

➡️GROUP A) IS STRICTLY BIBLICAL, AND WOULD NEVER ADOPT OTHER "Pagan" BEHAVIOR FROM ➡️GROUP B.
➡️GROUP B) JUSTIFIES EVERYTHING BY THE WAY IT IS, SO GOD WILLS IT THAT WAY, IS THE SHORT FORM.



WHERE/HOW does the journey of RIGHTEOUS THINKING begin in the Bible, and where/how is the GROUP B) currently:

FROM

UNTIL

God killed two sons of Aaron (Moose's brother, from whom all high priests must descend) because they did not light their own fire at the altar fire that God Himself kindled, as God instructed. Instead, they lit their own fire to incense to God. Imagine the situation: Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them, placed incense on them, and brought them before the Lord. Only then did the judgment come. → Then fire came out from the Lord and killed them.

We celebrate pagan festivals and traditions and place ourselves before an obelisk that demonstrably originates from a satanic temple/temple square, and pray to God before it. Therefore, the obelisk standing in Peter's Square comes from Egypt. More precisely: from the city of Helios (the second sun cult that the church apparently finds acceptable, as if there were no prophecy that satanic relics would be destroyed in the future, like the crescent moons).

A tabular list of all the pagan elements adopted follows, but only partially in tabular form. It extends throughout the entire brochure and is still incomplete, not only regarding paganism but also absurd heresies and sins. A complete list would be too much/too long. 10 out of 11 New Testament-believing Jews are Thora Christians (numbers at the very bottom) [the rest of the Jews are still hardened by God according to Romans 11]!
God's Holy People, God's Eyeball (according to Zechariah), who say: The teachings of the churches, no, we reject them, strictly the Bible counts.

Walk through the city remembering this:

Every 351st person on earth is an Adventist, a scholar on this topic (it's their main focus), and says the churches are from Satan_______VS_______Every 3195th person on earth is a church worker from one of the 3 major churches, Catholic/Evangelical/Orthodox. Many of them haven't even looked into Group A) and are often poorly taught the Bible, lacking understanding.

QUESTION: Isn't there a prophecy like "First, the people of GOD will change TIMES & LAW"? NO, 0.00%.
QUESTION: How much does GOD warn against ANTICHRISTIANITY in the OT & NT? Is it at least 30% of all warnings against evil?
QUESTION: Isn't it a MUST regarding responsibility and negligence to know 100%, also generally, whether one is ANTICHRISTIAN? 100%, ABSOLUTELY.
QUESTION: Is it really questionable, would GOD leave it questionable whether there is JUSTIFICATION in the NT? NO, 0.00%.
QUESTION: How can it be then that it happens despite all logic, if it's supposed to be so absurd? What was prophesied has happened (but this is 0.00% a justification), and it is clearly stated: SATAN IS RULER OF THIS WORLD & GOD OF THIS TIME. Furthermore: EVERYONE WORSHIPS THE BEAST, EXCEPT 144,000 JEWS (more symbolic, and not meant to completely exclude others; one must understand the spirit of language. An explanation of the spirit of language is at the very bottom).
GOD will establish his KINGDOM soon.

[DID YOU KNOW: The evidence and perspective of Group A) CANNOT be refuted. So: Either you examine it, which unfortunately very few do, and then believe the churches are from Satan, or you don't examine it and are then part of it, or you simply reject the churches. You cannot completely refute, purely factually and biblically, the idea that churches are from Satan. That is biblically impossible. Very few people engage with the topic and then completely reject the idea, mostly due to ignorance, as will become very clear below. "Jihadists" don't only exist in Islam.]

And how absurd the attempt to justify the changes in time and law is is shown here extremely clearly and in an easy-to-understand way - it partly resembles the absurd justifications of Islam, actual absurdities.
And for your information, for truly learned people, this is completely absurd, unbelievably absurd even.
Yes, with that I say: anyone who hasn't checked this and thought it through 👉as follows👈 shouldn't call themselves a "learned" person, responsibility.
As an understanding person, you have a duty to follow the important points. To reflect, to categorize, to teach.

For me it was clear: the most important thing first.
On the way to be absolutely sure whether the law of the Old Testament has been abolished or not, I saw someone who said: "The Pope/the Church is Satanic" and I just thought: "He's crazy." Maybe not everything is right, but satanic is something else. The more I learned, examined, and understood, the clearer it became: He was right. It is undeniable, but it is not perfectly explained. For me, the path was short, with understanding given by God, which God prescribes before one acts, up to this point and this actually simplest explanation, from layman's thinking to teacher's thinking. Decide for yourself, you may ignore the major historical narrative. [Religious war/alleged heretics who died to keep the 4th commandment, as it is written in the Bible.] The narrative, which is enormous due to the Adventist number of 24.6 million scholars in this field, all of whom say "Church = Antichrist, says the Bible."

[Every 351st person is an Adventist] 24.6 million_______VS_______➡️2.6 million [Every 3,195th person],
THE ENTIRE CHURCH WORKERS OF THE 3 MAJOR CHURCHES.
YES, THEY ARE ONLY APPROXIMATELY 2.6 million, CATHOLIC & EVANGELICAL & ORTHODOX IN TOTAL, FROM THE POPE TO THE NUN, TO THE DEACON, from whom one would have to assume [WHICH IS FAR FAR FROM THE CASE] that they have engaged with the OTHER, CORRECT VIEWPOINT (again: MINUS the FOLLOWERS, as in ISLAM). Reading the Bible once is not enough. The Bible itself says that the Holy Scriptures must be explained by those who understand, see Daniel 11:24. Six million Adventists, who despite losses in life, say this [THE CHURCHES ARE FROM SATAN], go through life for GOD (I love them very much for that). [For the numerical comparison, see the image at the very bottom]

You're hearing this for the first time and thinking the same thing I did back then? Martin Luther already said, "The Catholic Church is an Antichrist!" - NOT BECAUSE HE WAS ANGRY AT THE CHURCH, or because of the Church's temporary behavior, BUT BECAUSE OF THE FACTS (even if the Catholic Church's actions/words imply pure anger, since he did, in retrospect, initiate reforms which change NOTHING about the facts regarding Luther, even without reference to him).



⭐Martin Luther also directly applied Daniel 7:25 to the Papacy.
Why? His view:
Daniel 7:25 speaks of a power that:

"speaks words against the Most High"
"oppresses the saints"
"changes times and laws"
Luther believed that the papacy fulfilled precisely these three characteristics.

He wrote repeatedly, quite clearly, that Daniel 7 prophetically described the papacy for him.
He wrote this in:

in the Smalcald Articles (1537)
in the preface to Revelation (1530/1545)
in his sermons on Daniel
in several polemical writings

For Luther, Daniel 7 was a prophetic description of the papacy.
Many are also taught this by Dr. Walter Veith [Adventist], see: youtube.com



ℹ️WHAT ARE ANTICHRISTIANS ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE:
There are 3 classifications of the Antichrist, & 10 definitions (listed below) according to 1 John & 2 John. Only in these 2 letters is the Antichrist also called Antichrist:
1. The spirit of the Antichrist [the enemy or literally: of error, WORD G4106. (NOT SEDUCTION! OF THE INFLUENCE THAT LEADS WRONG! SEDUCTION IS A MISCELLANEOUSLY INTERPRETATED, LIMITED VERSION OF THE MEANING, AS PURE LEADING WRONG IS EXCLUDED [one doesn't have to offer you anything to mislead you].
WHICH HE IS LITERALLY CALLED "SPIRIT OF ERRORS", THE APPROPRIATE VERB G4105 IS TRANSLATED AS "SEDUCE" INSTEAD OF "LEADING WRONG" [*not in every translation])
& THEN THE IMPORTANT CONCEPT "SPIRIT OF ERRORS" GETS LOST when one reads "do not be deceived" 39 times [3 times directly in 1 John] & only 1 time "the SPIRIT of the ANTICHRISTIAN is the SPIRIT OF ERRORS"] 2. Many Antichrists [plural] have existed and will exist. 3. The Antichrist [singular] who will come at the end of Satanic rule on this world (Satan is the ruler, or god, of this world according to John 12:31, 14:30, 16:11, 2 Corinthians 4:4, Ephesians 2:2, 1 John 2:15-16, and John 15:19)! What MUST make ANY layperson who has ever read the Bible suspicious are at least these ➡️2 facts: ➡️1. Fact: Jesus, God, came to Earth and denounced the Jews for adhering to man-made commandments and thereby even nullifying God's commandments.
THIS, IN ORIGIN OF ESTABLISHING A NEW COVENANT IN THE WORLD IN WHICH EVERYTHING, REALLY EVERYTHING, IS MAN-MADE, & ALSO PARTIALLY ADOPTED FROM PAGAN [PAGAN = INDULGENTLY SATANIC] [like folding your hands in prayer 🙏 in the 6th century (the deity Shiva, Satanic, carved such images of followers in stone before Christ's time.)]? God intends to throw the pagans/enemies partially alive into the realm of the dead in the future, BUT BEFOREHAND, to adopt their traditions and customs, WITHOUT GOD'S COMMANDATION, DECIDED PURELY BY HUMANS WHO ALSO SUSPENDED GOD'S COMMANDMENTS/TRADITIONS FOR THIS. SO, THE STANDARD IN THE NEW COVENANT IS TO BE 1,000 TIMES STRONGER/WORSE THAN WHAT JESUS ​​DEFELLED? Blasphemous what one is doing to GOD with this, perhaps without thinking.

Read briefly for yourself and consider what one is doing to GOD JESUS ​​with this:
Mark 7:8-13
8 For you have forsaken the commandment of God and are keeping human traditions, washing the jars and cups, and doing many other similar things. 9 And he said to them, “You are very well rejecting the commandment of God in order to uphold your tradition. 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother must be put to death.’ 11 But you teach that if someone says to their father or mother, ‘Korban’ (which means ‘To the offering is set aside,’ 12 you no longer permit that person to do anything for their father or mother. 13 In this way, by your tradition that you have passed on, you are nullifying the word of God.” And you do many similar things.

That in the end, to establish a covenant in the world where everything is man-made, and 300 years after his death, slowly replacing and abolishing everything made by God—absurd, blasphemous.
Jesus also said the Sabbath is for man and not man for the Sabbath. But the church said away with the Sabbath, only to then kill those who keep the Sabbath because they didn't want to keep the Sunday. A church did kill those who keep the Sabbath. THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOD-GOTTEN, COMPLETELY MAN-MADE, 100% UNBIBLICAL (the change & the right to murder Christians), blasphemous.


➡️2. FACT
JESUS, GOD, came to EARTH & denounced the Jews for claiming to be superior to their forefathers, the PROPHET KILLERS. WAS THIS TO PLACE A COVENANT IN THE WORLD, IN WHICH CHRISTIANS, ENTIRELY, BECOME THE NO. ONE CHRISTIAN KILLERS IN HUMAN HISTORY? At least until now, before the Great War with Satan, which will only grow stronger in the coming years, leading up to World War III. It's blasphemous how GOD portrays this, when you say it was GOD's will/plan. This happened for an ENTIRE millennium, persecution/killing.

Read this briefly and think about what this makes of JESUS, GOD:
Mark 7:8-13
29 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you build the tombs of the prophets and decorate the monuments of the righteous, 30 saying, “If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have shared in the blood of the prophets.” 31 You testify to yourselves that you are the sons of the prophet-killers. 32 Fill up the measure of your fathers! 33 You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape the judgment of Hades? 34 Therefore I am sending you prophets, wise men and scribes; And some of them you will kill and crucify, and some you will flog in your synagogues and persecute from town to town, 35 so that on you will be upon all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of Abel the righteous to the blood of Zechariah son of Barachiah, whom you killed between the temple and the altar. 36 Truly I tell you, all this will come upon this generation. 37 Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you! How often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing! 38 Behold, your house will be left desolate to you; 39 for I tell you, you will not see me again from now on until you say, “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!”
(AND YES, THIS IS NOW/SOON, THE TEMPLE WILL BE BUILT SOON & THE MISSING 7 YEARS FROM DANIEL WILL THEN EXPIRE.)



Before we get to the pagan/Satanic traditions & customs of the Church, let's briefly review:
SAME IDEAS BETWEEN CHURCH & ISLAM
Remember that Satan weighs human logic, a SCALE, & tries to tip it with "DEMONSTRATIONS OF POWER" contrary to what GOD HAS TOLD. BUT IT IS KEY: ONLY GOD'S WORD THROUGH THE BIBLE IS ABOVE ALL ELSE - IF IT IS NOT 100% BIBLICAL, & 100% BIBLICALLY PROVEN, IT CANNOT BE.
RECOGNIZE/DISTINGUISH SATAN:

CHURCH	ISLAM
It spread throughout the world. First the religious war, then it continued with so-called "false believers/heretics" who did not accept what is not biblical and the distortion of God's word, changes that are not biblical, without God having commanded it. On the contrary, God has clearly forbidden it.	It spread throughout the world. First the religious war, then it continued with so-called "unbelievers" who did not accept the so-called new words of God.
It was still prevalent in the world until recently. In schools, Catholicism was sometimes forced upon you, as you were NOT allowed to call it untrue.	KILLS ITSSELF INTO THE WORLD TODAY.
IS GREAT, IS FROM GOD, PROOF.	IS GREAT, IS FROM GOD, PROOF.
KILL WITCHES, IS FROM GOD.	KILLING, CONQUERING & CONVERTING SATANIC PEOPLES IN SPREADING ISLAM, IS FROM GOD.
Contrary to Amos 3:7, which states that God prophesies all important things, there is nothing in the Bible about God's alleged second center of power, not even a word about it.	Contrary to Amos 3:7, which states that God prophesies all important things, there is nothing about Islam in the Bible, not a single word.
However, what the Church did is prophesied negatively, including the changing of times and the law in Daniel 7:25 [Don't mention Galatians 4:10 for the permanent change; that is pure suicide of a scholar, more on that in detail shortly! Similarly, Romans 14:5-6 for the law]. Furthermore, the Church itself is also prophesied negatively, since the whore of Babylon sits on seven mountains, just as Rome historically claims to be unique in size and time, having been built on seven mountains (even though many prefer to omit this fact). BUT ALSO HERE IN THE 1ST & 2ND LETTERS OF JOHN, THROUGH THE 10 ANTICHRISTIAN DEFINITIONS, WHICH ARE PARTIALLY FULFILLED. THEREFORE, IT HAS CLEAR ANTICHRISTIAN CHARACTERISTICS AND TEACHINGS THAT ARE BIBLICALLY UNJUSTIFIABLE AND IMPOSSIBLE TO JUSTIFY!	However, Islam is prophesied negatively in the First and Second Epistles of John through the 10 anti-Christian definitions, which Islam specifically fulfills, and more prophecies concerning all Arab peoples, and even more, see the Islam Prospectus. Therefore, it has all 10 anti-Christian characteristics and is biblically unjustifiable and impossible to justify!
To be brief, even killing oneself in the world is prophesied for the evil that will kill in the name of God, in John 16:2: They will kill you and serve my God, because they know neither Jesus nor the Father, here in the sense of truly knowing.	HERE ALSO IN THE SENSE OF REALLY KNOWING.
Do it, you don't need to know the OTHER SIDE, MY RESPONSIBILITY, your ACTION, you have NONE, you are ignorant.	Do it, you don't need to know the OTHER SIDE, MY RESPONSIBILITY, your ACTION, you have NONE, you are ignorant.

According to the Bible, Jesus was demonstrably born in the 9th or 10th month, half a year later than John the Baptist, and this can be calculated "precisely." And it's too cold for shepherds in winter, especially at night in the pasture. Sheep were always brought into the barn after the Feast of Tabernacles. Therefore, it's common knowledge that there were never any sheep in the pasture in Israel in December. Even if it had been a particularly warm year, it still wouldn't have made sense, since everyone would have said "it would have been too cold"... I don't think so... would God plan it that way and give Satan room to sow doubt? But that's not even a question, since that would be 2-3 months too late.

The Nativity story you know is a fairy tale, based on very few facts, and is NOT in the Bible. The Bible does not specify when the three wise men came, only that they came. Practices/customs adopted from paganism (including/possibly Satanic deities) by the Catholic and then Protestant churches. & Othodox Church:
(Previous information: "Baal" "Ashera" "Dagon" "Tammutz" are all SATANs mentioned in the OT.)

Satanic? (Baal, Ashera cult)	Is it in the Bible? Does it have a biblical justification? Is it not blasphemy?	Sin, among other customs:	Explanation:	Link(s) to check:
✔	❌	Christmas	It was "Christianized," from a satanic festival to a pagan one (December 25th is the birthday of the sun god "Sol," whose other name is supposedly "Tammutz." The Saturnalia, a time of gift-giving, also took place around this time). The festival is supposedly about the son of "Baal" and "Ashera," who is said to be like a sun, a light for the world. Regarding link 4: "(is unclear) the question of whether Christmas was linked to the date as a reaction to the Sol festival?", IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO CALL THIS A COINCIDENCE. Conclusion: According to the churches, it is okay to spread at least one lie about GOD'S birth date, to celebrate it on a pagan/satanic festival, along with fairy tales, even though ONLY 2 SATANIC people even celebrate birthdays in the Bible & no human being of GOD. Celebrating birthdays is therefore a PURELY satanic/pagan practice. ALSO HERE: One must again remember ADAM & EVA, a tree & underneath it (where the fruit falls) are gifts, then you will be like GOD Eve. CAN'T BE, IT DEVELOPED THIS OVER A LONG PERIOD? DO NOT BE Foolish (same tactics of Satan): 1. People began translating the word G733 (ἀρσενοκοῖται meaning: MAN - BED, i.e., homosexual) as "pedophile" in the 6th century. Reason: allegedly hatred of pedophiles. Punishment according to Revelation for deliberately mistranslating/altering the word of GOD: at most, Hell; a "minimum" is questionable in its literal sense, but indisputable because of "at most." Today: There are discussions: Is GOD being difficult? Is homosexuality forbidden according to the Bible? SATAN HAS TAKEN SPACE, CHRISTIANS HAVE GAVE HIM SPACE. Homosexuality, for which HELL is CLEARLY prescribed, is accepted, and homosexual marriages are even blessed. There are even eccentric communities. Evil always creeps in slowly and plans over centuries. 2. A bishop and Church Father, Augustine of Hippo (most likely a servant of Satan), begins to number the Ten Commandments differently. Unlike Moses, and all those since Moses, including Jesus. He makes the first two = one commandment and the last = two commandments. Time: 4th-5th century, later officially disseminated, here again from the 6th century onwards. Step 2: In the 6th century, the Church adopts this different numbering of the Ten Commandments, together with and at the same time as the shortening of the Ten Commandments into short form (keywords), so that the second commandment disappears completely from public knowledge. Back then, Bibles were rare. Step 3: Statues of Jesus, idols of God Jesus, were made and placed everywhere. NO, IDOLS ARE EXCLUSIVELY FIGURES OR THINGS OF DEVOTIONS SO LABELED IN THE BIBLE, OR MEANT THESE DEVOTIONS. From about 350–400 AD, Christians began to use statues – including of Jesus. From the 6th century: Jesus statues everywhere, a breakthrough for images and statues. The Church adopts the new numbering of the 10 Commandments (Augustine). The prohibition of images disappears from public abbreviation. Statues of Jesus, figures of Mary, and images of saints spread massively. Churches are filled with icons, frescoes, and statues. 1566 official edition of the "Roman Catechism" standardized the 10 Commandments in abbreviated form. This, contrary to Isaiah 44 where GOD SAYS VERY CLEARLY that HE forbids the act of worship of Those who find statues/figures ridiculous (verses to read and decide for yourself are listed below with the 10 commandments).	youtube.com youtube.com youtube.com evangelisch.de wikipedia.org wikipedia.org
✔	❌	Easter	Easter slowly supplanted a festival of God, Passover. VERY MOCKEDLY, EVEN IN SOME BIBLE TRANSLATIONS EASTER IS DESCRIBED – a clear, extremely grave sin!!! When "Ashera" wanted to go to heaven to Baal (her husband), he threw her to earth in an egg. Therefore, Easter eggs were dyed red with blood back then, supposedly the blood of children. One possible origin of Easter: Babylon. But even if this isn't true, Easter is definitely pagan (satanic).	youtube.com youtube.com youtube.com youtube.com
✔	❌	The Mitre	Similar to the sun god "Mitras". Possibly belongs to the "Fish God" Satan named "Dagon" (he is said to be the father of Baal), fish hats. "Dagon" priests actually wore such fish-mouth hats! Since this was carved in stone at the time, among other things, it can still be seen today! (Caution! Most links are for demonstration purposes only; the Bible should not be seen as inspired by humans, since all writing in the Bible is inspired by God the Holy Spirit, according to the Bible! Evidence for God's existence is in prospectus 1)	youtube.com youtube.com youtube.com wikipedia.org wikipedia.org evangelisch.de
✔	❌	Kissing the Ring	According to the Catholic Encyclopedia of 1907, in Chaldean times, a representative of "Dagon" was the head of the Church, and he was considered infallible! Furthermore, he was addressed as "Your Holiness." Nations subjugated by Babylon had to kiss the ring and shoe of the "King of God." Kissing the ring was a gesture made to greet the "Dagon" Pope. It remains the standard way to greet the Pope today.	⚙ The only point I still need to check is taken from another Christian. However, kissing the ring is a clear reference to Babylon.
✔	❌	St. Peter's Square, a sun wheel & the obelisk	The obelisk in the middle of St. Peter's Square (approximately 4000 years old, from an Egyptian temple of a satanic deity). These obelisks were traditionally erected as objects of power for the worship of satanic deities, and their names, such as "Baal," were engraved on them. In 2 Chronicles 34:4, sun pillars (Hebrew: chammānīm) that were felled are mentioned in connection with "Baal" and "Ashera." It is possible that obelisks belong to the same category in the Bible. Interestingly, it's the only obelisk in Rome not inscribed with hieroglyphs. To "promote Christianism" by "putting a cross on it" is so incredibly unbiblical; it turns God's word into a fairy tale—as if God would accept that as "okay." By that logic, can one also "promote Christianism" statues of Satanists? Blasphemous! 0% biblically sound... [Among the Ten Commandments below are a few verses showing what God thinks of Satanic figures. In others, it becomes clear that this isn't just about figures.] They even built toilets into pagan places of worship back then (but didn't use them) to render them unusable for the future. "Christianizing" them is a complete fairy tale.] Dr. Cathy Burns, Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated, 1998, pages 340/341: The word "obelisk" literally means "Baal's stem" or "Baal's reproductive organ." An obelisk is almost always placed in the center of a circle, which represents the female genitalia, and thus both together symbolize the physical sexual act. "Pornographic" material was already being spread by Satans back then. There is a Satanic book, similar to the Psalms, which, according to Roger Liebi, is highly pornographic, or rather, pure pornography.	schlachterbibel.de schlachterbibel.de youtube.com
✔	❌	Change the 4th Commandment! Sunday	Sunday (THE SUN'S DAY), the first day (not the 7th!), is, as the name, which is of satanic origin, already suggests, to honor the sun god. Because there is no better biblical justification, Romans chapter 14, verses 1-6, is often cited as justification, even though it is clear to anyone who reads it that it is about eating or fasting. On the contrary: the Bible makes it consistently clear that the Sabbath is forever the day on which we should rest. JESUS ​​WAS ALSO CRUCIFIED BECAUSE HEALING ON THE SHABAT AND SAYING, 'TAKE THE MAT AND WALK,' which is permitted. A link to the BIBLE PASSAGE of the absurd justification, which is clear to ANYONE who reads this, in the Schlachter Bible 2000 (Caution! The link to the translation is not an endorsement! Among other things, this translation also contains the 'ADDED CALL TO BAPTISM,' which is a grave sin according to Revelation (Schlachter LINK2) & one should not partake of sins! (Schlachter LINK3)). But that people, including priests, will take teachers who tell them what they want to hear, not what God says, is foretold (Schlachter LINK4).	youtube.com 1_schlachterbibel.de 2_schlachterbibel.de 3_schlachterbibel.de 4_schlachterbibel.de
❌	❌	Baptismal Call	In Revelation 22:18-19 it says that whoever takes away from this book or adds to it, God will add to that person all the plagues written in this book. And no, this of course doesn't only apply to Revelation, and you can rewrite all the other books, ridiculous. The Catholic Church has added a false baptismal formula (Matthew 28:19): In the Catholic Encyclopedia of 1907, on pages 262 and 263, it says that the Church changed the baptismal formula in the 2nd century from "In the name of Jesus Christ" to "In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." The same is also stated in the Encyclopedia Britannia, 11th edition, Volume 3, on page 365. As well as the Catholic ENCYCLOPEDIA VOLUME 8 confirms this once again: Justin Martyr was one of the early Fathers of the Roman Catholic Church who helped to transform the old baptismal formula "In the name of Jesus Christ" into the titles "Father, Son, Holy Spirit". The books must be borrowed or purchased; they are not available online.
✔	❌	Vatican	According to Amos 3:7, God will communicate "everything" through his prophets, everything that will happen! The Vatican is not mentioned in a positive light, not even once, in the Bible. Neither before nor after the final war! As if it didn't exist biblically at all? Yes, many interpret the woman in Revelation 17:9 as the Vatican, who sits on the seven mountains/hills (they refer to the seven mountains as the "Seven Hills of Rome," which briefly included Vatican Hill!). MORE PRECISELY: the Greek word ὄρος (G3735) FROM Revelation 17:9 MEANS mountain, hill, elevation (BUT NOT HILL, THERE ARE NO REFERENCES FOR THIS ON LSJ.GR | HOWEVER, THE 7 HILLS OF ROME > were called "Septem montes Romae" in Latin < (1. mons = "mountain, mountain range" | 2. THEY ALSO USED: collis = "hill, elevation", SO "Septem colles Romae". The first is attested, among others, in Festus (De verborum significatu 254 L) and in Roman topography. Modern research (e.g., Platner, The Septimontium and the Seven Hills, Classical Philology 1906) also confirms: the traditional designation is montes, not colles. Modern research (e.g., Platner, The Septimontium and the Seven Hills, (1906) emphasizes that "Septem montes" is the older cultic formula and "Septem colles" is the later historiographical term. Festus (2nd century AD and others such as Varro, Pliny, and Solinus) explains the festival of Septimontium, which was already celebrated in Republican times. It was a city festival of the inhabitants of certain hills within the early city of Rome. The name comes from septem montes = "seven mountains/hills". Which hills are meant: The festival did not refer to the later famous "seven hills of Rome" in the classical sense, but to an older grouping of seven elevations, which mainly comprised the Palatine Hill and adjacent ridges. According to Varro and Festus, these included the following hills: Palatium, Cermalus, Velia, Fagutal, Oppius, Cispius, and Caelius. The Vatican Hill, around and on which the Vatican is located, is also NOT one of the classical "seven hills of Rome," and is not isolated like a mountain, but part of a chain of hills that stretches from Monte Mario in the north to the Janiculum Hill in the south. A regional catalog from the 4th century AD actually lists the Caelian, Aventine, Tarpeius (Capitol), Palatine, Esquiline, Vatican, and Janiculum as the "seven hills"—the Quirinal and Viminal are replaced here by the Vatican and Janiculum. Why? Because the city expanded westward in the 3rd and 4th centuries, and the Vatican and Janiculum became important militarily (Janiculum) and religiously (Vatican). Was this adopted? Only in a few late antique catalogs, not as a permanent replacement for the classical seven. When Vatican City State became a separate entity in 1929... Since the Vatican was established through the Lateran Treaties, Vatican Hill (mons Vaticanus) was no longer part of the "seven hills of Rome," therefore it is HIGHLY questionable to interpret the seven hills in exactly this way. However, as a geographical reference, it is acceptable, but not only for that reason, but also because of everything else concerning the Bible and the Catholic Church. There are approximately 50 places worldwide to which seven hills/mountains are attributed (sometimes very absurd), but only three biblically relevant ones have anything to do with seven hills/mountains. 1. Rome 2. Constantinople/Istanbul (The designation "city of seven hills" has been established since late antiquity/Byzantium and is deliberately based on Rome.) 3. Moscow (as a later, but historically rooted, city legend. The "seven hills" reference originated in...) 15th-16th century in the context of the "Third Rome" idea and has been passed down locally ever since) ARE THERE ALTERNATIVES TO THIS? THE 7 MOUNTAINS COULD ALSO BE MEANT EXCLUSIVELY PROVERBLY FOR CENTERS OF POWER, HOWEVER, IT IS VERY OFTEN THE CASE THAT THINGS HAVE DOUBLE, OR EVEN TRIPLE, MEANINGS IN BIBLE PROPHECY. The author Steffen Fuchs claims (however, without any reference known to me & according to AI an undeniable mistranslation): the name "Vatican" has an interesting meaning. It is composed of the Latin words "vatis" (which means "prophetic") and "canus" (which means "snake"). Therefore, one could interpret the Vatican as "Prophetic Snake". (YOU DON'T DO THAT! ONLY THE PURE TRUTH KILLS LIE! THEREFORE, THIS BOOK SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WITH CAUTION! THE STATEMENTS OF THE BIBLE VS. THOSE OF THE CHURCH (INCLUDING ITS ACTS) ARE COMPLETELY SUFFICIENT. However, the book will probably still contain many truths. I WOULD BUY IT WHEN I HAVE TIME, BUT CHECK/VERIFY EVERYTHING WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF FRIENDLY FAITH WHO DO NOT ALLOW THEMSELVES TO LIES!) But, who hasn't heard of the lecture hall in the Vatican (PICTURE IN LINK 1), which, among other things, is designed and shaped in such a way that when you enter it, it looks as if you are looking into the face of a large snake. And from the outside, it looks like a snake's head. It doesn't get more absurd than that.	custos-sancto.blogspot.com buecher.de

What does God think of pagans and paganism?
Numbers 24-8… He (God) will consume the pagans, his adversaries (better called enemies), and crush their bones (or bodies) (or break them ℹ️👉Why no translator I know of has yet included the idea of ​​Judas' body being broken is incomprehensible. In the canon, God breaks a body, but doesn't crush bones👈), and strike them down with arrows. The last part (with arrows...) clearly points to a further process. Ignoring this verse, among others, the opinion is held that pagan festivals can be celebrated TO GLORY OF GOD, with 0% biblical justification.

The Bible teaches that one should listen exactly to God's word:
King Saul did not do this, and God rejected him and sent him an evil spirit that led him astray (1 Samuel 15-22-23 [here God says disobedience is like idolatry, i.e., SATANISM]).
A former prophet misled another prophet into acting against God's instruction by lying (by saying an angel had instructed him to change his teaching), and God killed the prophet because he disobeyed his instruction (NOT the one who lied) (1 Kings 13-21-24).
When a bearer reached for the Ark of the Covenant because cattle were stumbling, God killed him, since one should only touch the Ark by its poles. was allowed (2 Samuel 6-7).
Also ignored: Numbers 3-4: Regarding Moses' brother Aaron. God killed two of Aaron's sons because they did not take from the fire of the altar to incense as God commanded, and instead made their own fire.
God also did not accept that Jeroboam invented a festival in his own heart.
AND ALSO IN THE CHURCHES AFTER JESUS' CRUCIFIXION, SEVERAL CHILDREN PASSED AWAY (DIED BECAUSE OF THEIR SINS).



In Gal#4-10 G3906 (LINK to the word G3906 in the free dictionary LSJ.gr https://lsj.gr/wiki/παρατηρέω): Some translate the word as "observed". Although the word is translated as "observed", this meaning is actually somewhat questionable (in Aristotle's Rhetoric 1405b33 - the only reference, "observe" actually fits better, see in the download area). Galatians#4-10 in short: You observe the feasts of God. In fact, the word G3906 also means "to observe standing nearby," or "to beware of something," etc., DEPENDING ON THE CONTEXT! One could interpret "observed" here maliciously or misguidedly, since it (G3906) also means "to obey (a command)" (in Dio Cassius 53.10, see also in the download section). In German, one could say "observes commands," so theoretically, that fits. Although the question is whether the German "beachten" (to observe) doesn't broaden the meaning too much. The basic meaning of G3906 is indeed "to observe standing nearby," and it does NOT have the basic meaning of having respect for something in the sense of appreciation, but rather of focusing one's attention on something. In a letter, one wouldn't use it to mean "respectfully," which could easily be misinterpreted in Galatians 4:10 when translated as "notes." G3906 is a completely neutral word where the context reveals its meaning.
I [START (G3906)-BORED] AT THE SKY
I [START or gaze sweetly (G3906)-REJOICES AT THE CLOUDS] AT THE SKY
I [START watchfully (G3906)-AWARE, GUARDING MYSELF FROM THE THUNDERSTORM CLOUDS] AT THE SKY
SO THE QUESTION IS WHAT IS THE CONTEXT HERE IN GAL 4:10?







God changes the view of all the other laws [of the 613 mitzvot], but the view of the FIXED ones "cannot be changed," or "did God not want to change"? The festivals from Daniel 7:25 & from Leviticus 23:2 “These are my festivals” & said 4 times in Leviticus 23:14 & 21 & 31 & 41 “This is a perpetual ordinance in all your dwelling places for your [future] generations.” ABSURD, the Galatians simply had a problem: they wanted to be brought back into the Old Covenant.

Gal 4:8	Galatians 4:9	Galatians 4:10	Galatians 4:11
8 But back then, when you did not know God, you served those who by nature are not gods.	9 But now that you have come to know God, or rather, have been known by God, why do you turn again to weak and worthless principles, which you want to serve anew?	10 You observe days and months and times and years.	11 I am afraid for you, that in the end my labors for you have been in vain.
Gal 4:8 (SYNOPSIS)	Galatians 4:9 (in essence)	Galatians 4:10 (in essence)	Galatians 4:11 (in essence)
SATAN WORSHIP - SUDDENLY AND THE 1ST & LAST TIME MENTIONED IN THE LETTER OF GALATERN. [Galatians were previously pagans.] "Principles" which they previously served. HERE, BUT PRINCIPLES IN GENERAL ARE BEING TALKED ABOUT BEFOREHAND; THIS IS NOT AN EQUALIZATION WITH SATANISM. TO UNDERSTAND HOW: THAT THE PRINCIPLES OF THE NEW COVENANT CANNOT BE COMPARED WITH THOSE OF THE WORLD, WHICH ARE ONLY REGULATED BY LAWS.	RETURNING TO "weak and pathetic principles" [TURNING is always also a turning away] "IF YOU SAY THAT IS THE REASON, THE STATEMENT WITH WHICH THE FESTIVITIES WERE CANCELLED, YOU SAY" 👉GOD'S TESTIMONY OF HIS POWER IS SERVED HERE AS A PARADE EXAMPLE OF PAPRIKA, WIDO, ITS PERSPECTIVE. ALL THE YEARS SINCE MOSES, IT HAS BEEN SOMETHING BAD AND ALSO FORESEEING, SINCE ALL JEWS, BOTH OATH BELIEVERS AND NAT BELIEVERS, AS WELL AS THOROUGH CHRISTIANS, STILL CELEBRATE THESE FESTIVITIES TO THIS DAY]. So God puts something into the world that he then has to perceive as irrevocably bad. And everyone had to celebrate it, celebrates it, and according to Zechariah's prophecy, at least the Feast of the Leaf Huts will absolutely be celebrated again by everyone in the future.	[GOD'S PERSPECTIVE] YOU CELEBRATE MY TESTIMONY OF MY ACTIVITIES OF POWER (FEASTS FALL UNDER THE TERM "EDUT" = TESTIMONY IN THE OLD SEQUENCE, THEREFORE ALSO THE "EDUT" CATEGORY BY THE RABBINS IN THE 613 MITZWOT, WHICH IS 1 OF 3 CATEGORIES, THE EDUT CATEGORY/CLASS.)	I fear I have striven/worked in vain for you. (And for all Christians for the next 300 years, because that's how long the feasts continued to be celebrated. Jesus appeared resurrected with miracles, not only to the 12 apostles but to many. But nevertheless, and despite the alleged announcement here that the "testimonies of his power" should no longer be celebrated—so there must have been an alleged order—everyone continued to celebrate, one might even say unimpressed and without reverence.)
👉SATAN WORSHIP	👉BACK TO GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW 👉GOD'S TESTIMONY OF HIS EXECUTION OF POWER = NOW A PARADE EXAMPLE OF PATHETIC BECAUSE NO CHANGE OF PERSPECTIVE COULD BE MADE HERE?	👉[GOD'S PERSPECTIVE] YOU CELEBRATE MY TESTIMONY OF MY ACTIVITIES OF POWER	👉I'M Afraid I've strove/worked for you in vain. (And for all Christians for the next 300 years)

🛑👮👉 YES, THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGING THE FESTIVITIES, ACTUALLY. EITHER THAT'S TO BE UNDERSTOOD AS JUSTIFICATION, OR THE CHURCH HAS FULFILLED DANIEL 7:25. EVEN IF IT SEEMS ABSURD TO YOU NOW. THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGING THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IS NOT MUCH "BETTER" EITHER. CONSEQUENTLY LESS ABSURD, BUT STILL ABSURD. Galatians 4:10 states that the "death" of a "scholar" is the justification. 👈👮🛑 Anyone who now says this is about perspective... Either one can change one's perspective as with all other laws [of the 613 mitzvot], or God would have made the testimonies of God's power here the prime example of unchangeable wretchedness and weakness. Yes, the Jews of the Old Covenant celebrate the "testimonies of God's power," which, according to church logic, are supposed to be unchangeable legal principles. No wonder 11 out of 10 Jews [approx. [3 million vs. 300,000] who believe in the New Testament are Torah Christians. Because, yes, the "Church's Absurd Doctrine" is that this doesn't just refer to festivals, but rather "ALL JEWISH TRADITIONS." These festivals and traditions are all supposed to be "bad for the promised Spirit"—it doesn't get more absurd than that.

Also, the question arises: Is it not possible to change the perspective on how the festivals are celebrated?
The entire Law, 613 Mitzvot, has had its perspective changed, placed in the Spirit (Jeremiah 31:33), which, according to Jeremiah, is the definition of the "New Covenant" that Jesus brought, is "placing the Law in the Spirit," so that it must also be kept spiritually. But was/is it not initially possible to change the perspective at the festivals?
However, according to Zechariah at the Feast of the Huts, it is guaranteed to be possible to change the perspective in the future.
👉Possible in the future, 👉not yet. 👉So, for now, it is impossible to change the perspective on firm testimonies that are found in the law, even though God said that He would bring about a change of perspective for all laws, called "the new covenant," which Jesus introduced with the New Testament. The feasts are in no way to be excluded from the definition/explanation and announcement of the "New Covenant" in any context. Also in the way is the "greatest biblical statement (NT & OT)," which, when explained clearly for everyone, is this: Until heaven and earth pass away (everything written in the Bible has happened, since it refers to this prophecy), not one of the smallest Hebrew letters of the law will pass away until everything (written in the Bible) has happened.
👉 THE ENTIRE BIBLE 👉 BROKEN DOWN TO A LETTER OF THE SMALLEST LETTER 👉 REPEATED, THEREFORE REINFORCED, CALLED THE ENTIRE BIBLE CONTEXT - "UNTIL ALL IS HAPPENED"
There is no similarly great linguistic, contextual statement in the entire Bible!
🛑This statement therefore extremely forbids: ANY CHANGING OF TIMES (LAW) & LAW.🛑 👉Explanation of linguistic spirit is in the next image.
A 100% ABSURD WAY OF THINKING!

🛑One could also try to say: "Here the perspective on "Idols made" – there are, however, no examples of this in the Bible. Idols are exclusively figures or objects of deities so named in the Bible, or rather, they refer to these deities. They are always connected to deities. Colossians 3:5, "Greed is idolatry," is the only passage that can be willfully misinterpreted, but it means: Greed is not a characteristic of children of God, but of idolaters/servants of Satan. Someone who thinks watching TV is great and makes it their idol is simply unbiblical and unacceptable. New pagan festivals and traditions are needed because, according to the church, they should be better for the promised spirit; otherwise, why would anyone switch? And yes, that is also Catholic teaching: not only the feasts, but all "testimonies - Edut" are, along with all Jewish traditions, practically bad for the promised spirit, absurd. It should also be mentioned that there is, among other things, the unforgivable sin of willfully choosing the sinful path, even guaranteeing it if one chooses Satan again after A) having found God and B) having experienced God's power. God does not forgive this sin, and He calls these people "dogs who return to their vomit," who, according to Revelation, are thrown into hell. One, in some cases the only, way to experience God's power is by celebrating the "testimonies of His mighty actions." God created everything in six days; the Sabbath, the seventh day, is the testimony to this. Exodus: as a testament, the Passover, the Feast of Tabernacles, Mezuzah, etc...
There is even a prophecy in Zechariah regarding the Feast of Tabernacles, that it will be celebrated "again" in the future. Future demonstrations of God's power have already been mentioned: in Zechariah, the parting of the mountain, as was the case with the sea, and also the fire from heaven in the Book of Revelation, as with Sodom and Gomorrah, and that the heathens will descend alive into the realm of the dead, etc... So God's exercise of power is not bad now; on the contrary, it is and always has been a glimmer of hope.

It is prophesied that "everyone" will worship "the beast," and that is why it is happening. One must consider the overall context; therefore, the question of whether G3906 should be translated here is irrelevant! There must be festivals, because someone evil, even the Antichrist [whose spirit was already in the world around 90 AD, according to 1 John], will seek, according to Daniel 7:25, to change the times (festivals) and the law (meaning: to change the law and the law, since the festivals are also in the law, so this is specified here). Anyone who seriously says that GOD means satanic festivals [i.e., the Antichrist will seek to CHANGE satanic festivals {which includes abolishing them as a possibility - which the Catholic Church did}], because GOD has simply rejected his "eternal festivals," which even have a prophetic meaning, and "according to misthinking" in Galatians 4-9 calls them "weak and mortal principles" [which actually describes, among other things, the view of the festivals if one does NOT want to translate it as BEWARE OF SOMETHING], even though they will be celebrated again in the future [i.e., weak and mortal principles, until in the future they are no longer weak and mortal principles], should remain silent and listen to those who listen to GOD (1 John 4-6), and not to man-made misguidance. In Zechariah 14-16...19 the pagans must (in the future) celebrate God's Feast of Tabernacles, otherwise God will punish them for it, a clear contradiction. Celebrating festivals can also be understood as worship.
Is this to deify pagan festivals, without any prophecy, which would be necessary to legitimize them according to Malachi 3:7 [God communicates everything [important, logically] through his prophets]?
That this is irrational logic is clearly evident; consider Daniel 7:25.



Christmas = Winter Solstice

Easter = Babylonian possible origin fits perfectly into the overall picture

Corpus Christi = 1 day before Halloween, supposedly also a satanic festival

A pattern is discernible.



Galatians 4-10 is the only verse that, if misunderstood, labels God's own festivals as something bad. WOULD [as a prime example of trying to be saved by the law, which would be an absurd example], otherwise there is no one else who would do that. But what does one make of God when one says, God says: My own festivals are wretched, those of the pagans/Satans are the good festivals! As if God, the God of gods who knows the future and everything [meant in context], could not create his own good festivals. That is pure blasphemy. Pagan (Satanic) and man-made things are rejected to the point of hatred in the Bible, and Jesus denounced them. Believers emigrated to America because the CHURCH killed Christians (approx. 50-100 million), which is why the following was written into the American Constitution: "NO ONE MAY BE PERSECUTED BECAUSE OF HIS FAITH" (Later consequence: Today there are PUBLIC Satanic temples/churches in America, and Satanism is a religion there). As if all the early Christians fled to America because they didn't understand that God now finds pagan (satanic, i.e., hostile) things great and is adopting them as his own. Totally absurd.



The question is, what makes the difference to you that, in your opinion, God says—not literally, but still—that celebrating satanic/pagan festivals/customs (birthdays) is okay?



God wants to fight against the pagans in the future and throw them and their Satans into hell, but until then, one should be able to celebrate pagan festivals?



What has changed in your opinion that this is now okay?
1. God? No! God doesn't change. (Malachi 3-6 & Hebrews 13-8, James 1-17) 2. Do people, the world, thereby reflect God's opinion? Yes, but NO. God's opinion on the future of pagan people is clearly stated: Hell. (Revelation 21-8) 3. Are the Satans behind it? No, the judgment remains the same until the end of the events of Revelation. According to the Bible, Satan's servants present themselves as servants of God. That they then mistranslate, misinterpret, and misteach the Bible, and mislead the flock as much as possible, is the logical consequence. The Bible clearly identifies this misguided leading as a satanic practice (2 Corinthians 11-13...15: Apostles in disguise, ministers of righteousness in disguise, the highest being God, and Satan in disguise). Please read the story of Balak and Balaam (Numbers 22-24) for an indication of this. And Jesus says, "Before my eye/arm/leg becomes a stumbling block, I'll tear it out/cut it off/cut it off" (This occurs 3 times: Matthew 5:29, Matthew 18:8-9, and Mark 9:47). A stumbling block is something that could lead to sin. If you say in Daniel 7:25 that the pagan festivals were indirectly called, is that the limit? Or, according to 2 Corinthians 3:17, "Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom," are we also allowed to Christianize other pagan/satanic customs and make them to the glory of God? If no one is harmed and it doesn't violate other New Testament laws? So, is it permissible to offer sacrifices to God with incense on old pagan altars (do some still exist?) or to place ritual breads on them? Is there a limit to adopting pagan customs? In the Old Testament it says one must not cut one's hair and beard like the pagans, but now fish hats like those worn by Dagon priests are okay? Absurdly anti-Christian. Nowhere does God say we adopt these pagan customs, and that's where it ends, because God doesn't say that at all, and certainly doesn't permit it. Amos 3:7 "The Lord God does nothing except to reveal his purpose to his servants the prophets." — BUT THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT "WE NOW CELEBRATE LIKE OUR ENEMIES, THE PIGGY," OR "THE 10 COMMANDMENTS ARE CHANGED - THE 2ND COMMANDMENT IS COMPLETELY DELETED, THE 10TH COMMANDMENT IS THEN MADE INTO 2 COMMANDMENTS, & THE 4TH COMMANDMENT ABOUT SHABAT IS REWRITED TO BE SUNDAY (to fit the sun worship cult)." Instead, Jesus says in Matthew 5:18, "Until heaven and earth pass away, not one stroke of a pen will pass from the law until everything is accomplished. (By everything, literally everything prophesied in the Bible is meant, until the new earth and the new heaven from Rev. 21:1 / 2 Peter 3:13 / Isaiah 65:17 / Isaiah 66:22)" Furthermore, Isaiah 66:17 states: "...whoever eats pork, mice, and other abominations—all of them shall be swept away (killed!), says the Lord." And yes, this refers to the future, which becomes clear through Isaiah 66:15. THE GENERAL UNDERSTANDING TO WHICH ISAIAH #66-17 REFERS: This prophecy refers to the coming judgment on the Day of the Lord. It is expected to happen in the end times, when God judges the world. So, once again, one has to lie around the issue; eating pork suddenly/uncommon/a one-time SYMBOLIC event (for rebelling against GOD). And eating pork is only a sin for PIGGY people? Absurd, because an abomination in the Old Testament is always a sin, and vice versa. I am NOT saying, however, that GOD is specifically referring to Christians who are to be killed! And the 1260 years from, among other sources, Revelation are only days and not years (although according to Daniel they are definitely years), even though they were fulfilled ABSOLUTELY TO THE YEAR (538-1798, MORE ON THAT IN A MIND). THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE AN UNBELIEVABLE COINCIDENCE, & HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PROPHECY FULFILLED IN DETAIL? ABSURD & "ASTONISHING", AS IT IS ALSO CALLED, ASTONISHING REV#13-3 "And the whole earth looked on in wonder at the beast." The Catholic Church killed approximately 100 million Christians for heresy. These were Christians who wanted to observe the fourth commandment, the Sabbath (not Sunday!), and those who wanted to translate and preach the Bible (as commanded by the Gospels). The practice of buying absolution from sins should also be mentioned; this occurred around 1100 when the Church held power over the emperors.
There was and is, of course, absolutely no, not even remotely any, biblical justification for persecuting and killing other Christians, even if they had sinned.

Because the Bible says in Revelation that the first beast (=military power), which all will worship, will persecute believers for 1260 years, which exactly happened to the Church (in 538, the decree that the Pope alone rules/determines all believers comes into effect, and the 1260 years of persecution begin and end in 1798), then it receives a wound from the sword ("sword" in the Bible always means an act of war) (in 1798, the Pope is deposed and arrested by the French through military action, literally put in chains, and the decree is abolished/replaced). When the mortal wound of the sword was healed (1815 - The Papal States recover), many people believe that this part of the prophecy has been fulfilled. It must be said, VERY OFTEN NOT EVERYTHING HAPPENS IMMEDIATELY, but in stages, as something else follows. And, as is common in prophecy, it may be fulfilled a SECOND TIME, although this is not a requirement, and if it is, it doesn't need to be in such detail. Another example: how, among other things, the "abomination of desolation" prophecy will be repeated, as Jesus explicitly stated. SOME SAY DANIEL 9:27 HAS ALREADY BEEN FULFILLED, BUT THAT WOULD BE TOO INCARES, SINCE SOME THINGS DID NOT HAPPEN. HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO ROGER LIEBI, FOR EXAMPLE, THEY FLEE TO THE MOUNTAINS AND WERE SAVED BY MEANS. AN EXAMPLE THAT A PROPHECY MAY BE FULFILLED. It can be partially fulfilled beforehand, not entirely, but on a small scale.

Whoever among the Bible teachers, readers, and thinkers now says that this is not possible because the Catholic Church is no longer a military power, or rather says that Islam with the Mahdi (Islamic Messiah) will be one of the beasts, to them I would say, how about both, purely theoretically?

Martin Luther said the Catholic Church is the Antichrist. The reason is not in question, because it did exactly what, according to Daniel 7:25, the Antichrist will do. In retrospect, even including the 1260 years of prophecy, including the sword wound and the healing of this actual death wound.

According to the Bible definition, behind Islam, which explicitly fulfills all 10 biblical definitions of the Antichrist and leaves none out, is Satan. This leads one to think theoretically that the popes and the majority of bishops were and are not, and theoretically are, with God, and theoretically glorify and fight, in the form of misdirection where possible, including theoretically for "Baal" and the highest Satan, "Lucifer." Since the Bible clearly states that such things exist, subversion through deception. Theoretically, one could say that, among other things... The churches belong to satanic deities (that's how Satan is described in the Old Testament, AS GODS), and these deities are waging war against God not only, but also through the churches. One mustn't forget that the coming war is the final war and the two beasts (military forces) of Satan. So we have to think bigger.



Excerpt from (Adventist Declaration on the 1260 Years):

https://new.adventistreview.org/the-word/understanding-the-1260-year-prophecy



The Justinian Code, completed in 534, “established orthodox Christianity,” established the Pope as the formal head of Christendom, “commanded all Christian groups to submit to [his] authority,” and gave him civil power over life and death over heretics.4

...

However, this code was not legally promulgated and enforced locally until the siege of Rome was lifted in 538. was

...

“The Great Controversy”—Ellen White: In the sixth century, “the Bishop of Rome was declared the head of the entire Church. Paganism had given way to the papacy. The dragon had given the beast ‘his power, his seat, and his great authority.’ Revelation 13:2. And now began the 1,260 years of papal oppression. . . . Daniel 7:25.”3 Here Ellen White focuses on the moment of empowerment by legal authority.

...

“The papacy never returned to the control of the Ostrogothic kings.”7 The papal system, which stood at the head of Christendom and, through the Codex Justinianus, was given the power over the life and death of heretics, persisted in the West for over 1,000 years. These secular revolutions began with the French Revolution, which soon led to the capture and exile of the Pope by Berthier in 1798. More significant than the military and political event of the capture and exile, however, was the replacement of the religiously oriented Justinianic Code with the secular Napoleonic Code. The secular legal code was implemented through the famous Law No. 8 of February 15, 1798, in which General Berthier declared Rome an independent republic and, “as a consequence, every other secular authority emanating from the old government of the Pope was suppressed and was to cease to function.”



MY CONCLUSION: 1260 YEARS OF PROMISED OWN AUTHORIZATION TO DECIDE OVER THE LIFE & DEATH OF ALL CHRISTIANS/HERETIZERS, WHICH HAPPENED IN LARGE NUMBERS.


Churches in Timeline - In 1 Timothy#4-1...3, the text deals with demonic teachings, such as forbidding marriage. According to these verses, at least one of the three categories of the Antichrist (1. Spirit of the... 2. Many Anti... 3. The Antichrist) will forbid marriage, which the CHURCH did, even though GOD prescribes two children as a requirement for a church leader in 1 Timothy#3:4...5. In 1 Timothy 4-4, God logically does NOT speak of unclean animals, but of those defined as food. ["Everything" is, as always, meant contextually; human flesh was also created by God. => I explain the Hebrew spirit of the language, which is also in the New Testament, among other places in Book 7. It is debated whether it is also in the New Testament, but biblical Greek is very similar, only slightly less strict regarding the non-existence of context-free statements, i.e., absolute statements. God probably chose Hebrew for his chosen people when he confused the languages.] Again, I refer to Isaiah 66-17, the future killing of those who eat animals "NOT DEFINED AS FOOD" and commit such atrocities. Every abomination in the Old and New Testaments is a sin, and every sin is an abomination, which is absolutely clear in the books of Moses. No second alleged example can be found for an abomination not being a sin.
abomination = sin => consequently, we arrive at: It is a sin, but you are allowed to do it.



Why the teachings of the demons regarding celibacy:
Both celibate life and eunuch priests in pagan antiquity were systematically, i.e., institutionally, prescribed in certain cults, not merely isolated cases. The Cybele cult, in particular, had a clearly organized, permanently castrated priesthood.

🏛️§ 1. Systematic Celibacy in Pagan Religions
Celibacy was not universally common in paganism, but it was institutionally prescribed in several cults – either permanently or for the duration of the office.

§1.1. Vestal Virgins (Rome) – 30 Years of Obligatory Celibacy
Priestesses of Vesta

30 years of absolute sexual abstinence
Breaking the vow was punishable by death
Afterwards, they were allowed to marry, but rarely did.

➡️ Clear case of systematic, state-controlled celibacy.

§1.2. Priestesses of Artemis & Athena (Greece)
Many of these priestesses had to remain virgins

Duration: usually a term of office, not for life
Partially strictly monitored

➡️ Temporary, but institutional celibacy.

§1.3. Orphic & Pythagorean Priests/Ascetics
Strict sexual abstinence as a spiritual duty

Partially for life
No eunuchship, but systematic asceticism

➡️ Celibacy as a spiritual discipline.

🏛️§ 2. Systematic Eunuch Priests – especially in the Cybele cult
Here it becomes clear: Yes, in the Cybele cult, castration was systematically prescribed.

§ 2.1. The Galli (Galloi) – Eunuch Priests of Cybele
Sources: Wikipedia, Britannica, Ancient Origins

§ What was prescribed?

Self-castration as an initiation rite
Afterwards, lifelong eunuchship + celibacy
Weared women's clothing, long hair, jewelry
Weared only certain ritual foods
Lived as a priestly caste in the service of the Magna Mater (Cybele)

§ Why systematic?
Castration was a prerequisite for admission to the priesthood
The cult had an organized hierarchy (e.g., the Archigallus)
The practice is described in many ancient sources (Plutarch, Lucian, Tertullian, Roman legal texts)

➡️ This is the clearest case of an institutionalized eunuch priesthood in antiquity.

§ 2.2. The Attis Myth as a Religious Justification
The myth recounts that Attis castrated himself; Cybele then established a caste of eunuch priests.
Source: Cybele and Attis Cult – Wikipedia

➡️ The priests ritually imitated the myth – a systematic religious precept.

🏛️§🌍 3. Other Cultures with Eunuchs or Celibate Priests
Not as strict as with Cybele, but worth mentioning:

§3.1. Mesopotamian Priests (Gala, Assinnu, Kurgarru)
Partially of a different gender or castrated
Served goddesses like Inanna/Ishtar
Not always systematically castrated, but an institutionally anchored special role

§3.2. Anatolian and Syrian Cults
Some groups of priests lived ascetically or sexually abstinently
Partly associated with ritual self-castration (similar to Galli)
There is a high probability that both the Protestant and Catholic churches are fulfilling at least one pre-prophecy for the final prophecy, similar to the "Abomination of Desolation" prophecy. This prophecy has already been made and is being made again. Therefore, there is a high probability that the "role" of the beast will theoretically pass/pass on to the theoretical Islamic beast, since the final battle described in the Bible is against "Gog" and "the kings of Arabia." This is not far-fetched, as the "Baal" cult was formerly based in the areas where Islam spread, and in some places where it is today. Arab countries, along with Russia and China, are theoretically the opponents of the final war. This was prophesied in the Bible to the kings of Arabia and the specifically named Arab countries, and Russia, approximately 1000 years before Islam. These "three parties"—Russia, China, and the Arab League—are also engaged in strategic military cooperation.


✝✝✝✝✝✝✝
Antichristian, roughly defined, means positioning oneself in place of GOD and thus acting against GOD (e.g., speaking), which is always hostile. The 10 definitions of "the one Antichrist," "the many Antichrists," "the SPIRIT of the Antichrist," in short - of everything that is Antichristian: Whoever fulfills even ONE of these is already ANTICHRISTIAN and acts against GOD, and may even place their word above GOD'S word and thus THEMSELVES above GOD (except for the Jews, whose perspective was determined by GOD according to "2 Corinthians 3:14," "Romans 11:25," "Romans 11:7-8," "Isaiah 6:9-10," "Matthew 13:14-15," and "Mark 4:12"). It is important to note that some definitions may sound redundant because they are partially intertwined, but each individual definition has its own area that must be fulfilled. One fulfillment is enough!
👉🌈🤍The 10 Definitions of “FALSE LEADING”, the ANTICHRIST:
Definitions of the Antichrist BEFORE 1 John 2:26:
👉 1. They came from us (1 John 2:19)
👉 2. Denies that Jesus is the Christ (=Messiah/Anointed One) (1 John 2:22)
👉 3. Denies the Father (1 John 2:19)
👉 4. Denies the Son (whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either) (1 John 2:19)
👉 5. They lead astray, into the spirit of error (1 John 2:26: I wrote this to you about those who are deceiving you, or leading you astray) lead.)

Definitions of the Antichrist ACCORDING TO 1 John 2-26:
👉 6. Denies Jesus as God in human form on earth
(God in flesh) (1 John 4-1-3)
👉 7. Does not listen to those who listen to God, disobedience. (1 John 4-6)
👉 8. Deviates from the teaching of Christ (that is, also from the Law,
or the crucifixion and its justification; in short, contradicts the teaching
of Christ, if not the entire Bible). This is summarized from 1 John 3-7, 4-6 &
2 John 1-5-11
👉 9. They will try to befriend you, greet you (1 John 1-10 & 2 John 1-11), and try to build a
certain fellowship. What would "giving Satan a place" be?
(Eph#4-27, space = possibility; cf. space for repentance Heb#12-17 & 2 Pet#3-9). So they will try to gain a possibility of fellowship, since one can justify oneself better and be more credible from such a position. How? It's something similar to what we believe, and we are in some way in agreement, instead of having no fellowship at all, no unity. One must always think of all people; many are easily influenced and misled. Therefore, clear boundaries are desired.
👉 10. They are enemies, hostile in nature! (This is evident from all the verses)
Historically, there has been much war between Muslims and Christians, but the notion that they are the same God and of the same origin has always persisted. But those who are wise know the answer to all questions about the Bible and God, which is: "IT'S ALL ABOUT THE SPIRIT!" EVERYTHING IN THE BIBLE IS ONLY ABOUT THE SPIRIT! WHAT GOD FORBIDS, ALLOWS, DOES, IT ALL HAS ONLY ONE REASON: THE SPIRIT. And there, the Old and New Testaments are naturally the same.
✝✝✝✝✝✝✝




Every word is an action, and every action is/has a statement.
Every decision is either satanic or divine.
What is from God and what is from Satan is defined by the Bible, not by a human being.
If you do something that is not from God, you are doing something against God, for the Satans.
Whoever knows about such evil deeds and remains silent about them shares in the sin.
Not everyone who calls God "Lord" enters the Kingdom of God according to the Bible,
not even those who cast out demons in his name.
What have you done in his name?
The message of a Christmas celebration is that blaspheming, mocking, and ridiculing God is okay. This is found,
because one might perceive the custom as a pleasant experience (especially when, as now, one knows that
Christmas is satanic).
God cannot be mocked or provoked to his face, according to the Bible [see image 2]. [👇 2 images from the New Covenant explanation follow]
The completely unjustifiable actions of the churches are clearly evident, which is also prophesied, so you can see that it doesn't fit into any logical picture. After the death of the apostles, with which they bitterly and hard-won founded communities (three of them were crucified, if not one of the three even flayed alive for spreading the gospel), according to the churches, one is allowed to become pagan.
NO, ACTUALLY THE MORONIC STATEMENT IS THAT GOD FOUND HIS OWN ACTUALITY UNCHANGEABLE, AT LEAST FOR NOW "WORSHIPFUL" & PAGAN/SATAN SO GREAT THAT HE WANTED TO ADOPT IT AS HIS OWN CUSTOMS AND FESTIVALS ACCORDING TO GAL. 4-9...11, AND YES, THE 2000 BUTTER'S BIBLE EVEN WRITES THIS...
JUST CLICK ON THE "1" THEN IT SAYS AS A NOTE: "i.e., they observed special religious festivals and holy times according to Jewish custom."
Schlachterbibel Galatians 4:10








=======> EXPLANATION OF THE CONTEXT OF PAGAN CONVERSION/ADAPTATION [I won't list the verses where GOD says destroy the pagan, or pagans = enemies here, there are too many.]: <=======
[AS A QUESTION, THAT WOULD BE TOO COMPLEX FOR AI, UNFORTUNATELY.]

Consider, contrary to my thinking on this, the statement in the Bible (in Daniel #7-25) is: "THE ANTICHRIST WILL SEEK TO CHANGE PAGAN (SATAN) FESTIVALS & THE LAW [WHICH INCLUDES ABOMINATION AS A POSSIBILITY - which the Catholic Church did]", WHICH IS ABSURD, BECAUSE WHY SHOULD SATAN, SATANIC (PAGAN) ATTEMPT TO CHANGE?

AND NOTE THAT THERE IS NO CONTEXT, EITHER IN THE LETTERS OF GALATERN, NOR IN THE ENTIRE BIBLE, THAT SAYS GOD FINDS HIS FESTIVALS WORSHIPPED [AS A PARADE EXAMPLE OF BAD BEHAVIOR] & FINDS PAGAN FESTIVALS, OR PAGANITY IN GENERAL GREAT.

& INFO ON THE CONTEXT:
ON THE CONTRARY: THE BIBLE SAYS (THEREFORE IT IS IN THE OVERALL CONTEXT OF THE BIBLE):

ONE SHOULD NOT DO ANYTHING LIKE THE PAGANS! The Old Testament texts in Leviticus 19:27 and 21:5 clearly require that the beard not be altered in a way that – in the view of that time – was typical of pagan customs. Therefore, many Christians and Jews interpret it as follows: One should not cut one's beard/hair like the pagans.

& Exodus 23:32–33 and Exodus 34:15–16 warn against making alliances or treaties with the peoples of the land, because this could inevitably lead to the adoption of their gods and customs.

& Deuteronomy 7:1–6 emphasizes the difference between Israel and the pagan nations, for example by referring to Israel as “a holy nation” that should not adopt the laws and customs of the other nations.

Leviticus 18:4 states that one should not adopt Egyptian or Canaanite customs (H2708 & H4941): one should adopt theirs. DO NOT ACCEPT LAWS/CUSTOMS & LIVE LIKE THE PIGGY (Even though it only mentions EGYPTIANS & CANAANITES here, this clearly applies to all PIGGY PEOPLES)! (HERE, in LEVITICUS 18:4, THE SAME 2 WORDS ARE USED FOR THE EGYPTIAN & CANAANITE LAWS/CUSTOMS THAT ARE ALSO USED FOR THE 613 COMMITMENTS & PROHIBITIONS, FAITHFULLY AS GOD USES THEM IN THE BIBLE.)

[FOR AN EVEN MORE DETAILED LIST SEE 👉BT7 | Bible Theory 7: Understanding the New Covenant, Sin & Law]
Bible Theory 7 Excerpt:

Based on the three terms "Mishpat" (מִשְׁפָּט), "Chukkot/Chok" (חֹק / חֻקֹּת), and "Eidot/Edut" (עֵדוּת / עֵדוֹת), the rabbis divide the "Mitsvah" (מִצְוָה), that is, the 613 commandments and prohibitions, into the three Mitzvah classes/categories: "Mishpat," "Chukkim," and "Eidot":

H"4687" – מִצְוָה (Mitsvah) → General term for the 3 divisions of the 613 commandments & prohibitions

H"2706" – חֹק (Chok) → statute, general term for established order
H"2708" – חֻקָּה (Chukkah) → ritual statute, often for cultic regulations
H"4941" – מִשְׁפָּט (Mishpat) → legal regulation, judicial ruling or ethical law
H"5715" – עֵדוּת (Edut) → testimony, statement; refers to commandments that testify to God's actions (e.g., Sabbath, Passover, tefillin [which are tied on the hand AND forehead; tefillin are a reminder of Rev #14:1 & #7:3]). Both the words "Chok" and "Chukkah" come from the same root (חָקַק, ḥāqaq) and denote divine decrees whose motivation is not fully explained. Halakha, both belong to the category of Chukkim—the "statutes" whose full logic is reserved to God himself. A good Chukkah example: Ezekiel 36:27 "...and take away your sin and give you a new spirit and perform my Chukkah in you."

Prospectus 1 of 3 Proofs (including the latest scientific ones) that God exists and the Bible is the truth.	Prospectus 2 of 3 Sins of the Church	Prospectus 3 of 3: Islam and the Bible – Contrasts at a Glance, a Comparison of Laws and Future Prophethood.
www.gods-light.net/proofs_en.html	www.gods-light.net/sins-of-the-churches_en.html	www.gods-light.net/the-islam_en.html